Uploaded by braddo 
2000x1463 PNG 990 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
“Id stare toothey both look great in either gender!”
Tags
+-SH safe2280598 +-SH artist:b-epon401 +-SH shining armor29200 +-SH twilight sparkle371561 +-SH alicorn336755 +-SH pony1710596 +-SH unicorn587288 +-SH g42122913 +-SH :o7064 +-SH blushing293479 +-SH brother and sister7912 +-SH cute280253 +-SH duo208621 +-SH dusk shine2859 +-SH dusk shine (alicorn)15 +-SH duskabetes63 +-SH duskcest2 +-SH eye contact7867 +-SH female1911426 +-SH floppy ears78074 +-SH gleamibetes61 +-SH gleaming shield1524 +-SH horn251191 +-SH horns are touching950 +-SH implied incest2177 +-SH infidelity10669 +-SH infidelity shield2 +-SH male589657 +-SH mare813658 +-SH prince dusk378 +-SH raised hoof76862 +-SH rule 6334997 +-SH rule63betes688 +-SH shining adorable699 +-SH ship:dusk shield22 +-SH ship:shiningsparkle1914 +-SH shipping268101 +-SH siblings25914 +-SH stallion215613 +-SH straight189156 +-SH twicest1901 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)155239 +-SH wide eyes20482
Loading...
Loading...
Or is that ship just a joke
Siblings just wanna have fun.
Let’s not start this stupid argument again. We see one thing, you guys see another. We think you’re wrong and vice versa. Just shut up about it.
Yes because whenever I see two siblings together, I ALWAYS have incestuous thoughts about them. Give me a break.
It’s meant to be humourous and let the people know looking at the image that it is not incest, even if it appears so. You know, humor? It’s meant to be funny.
I’m pretty sure the tag shouldn’t even exist
No, I don’t, but as someone said earlier the simultaneous blush does tend to complicate how the image can be viewed.
So then I guess every image in the “not incest” tag should be removed then, huh? It isn’t incest in any of those pictures, so I guess the tag shouldn’t exist.
And you have no right to say I have problems. There’s a difference between real life and fictional characters. Do not cross that line in order to insult me.
Let’s not tag what an image isn’t, let’s tag what an image is.
Edited
Oh my god, are we really going to pull this argument? Did you not read my comment?
It looks like it could or might be incest. I don’t care if you don’t think so. Look at the goddamn tag.
They are looking at each other and blushing. The artist removed the image from their blog, so you can’t tell if it is or isn’t.
Just because you’re squeamish of incest doesn’t mean you can say that the image couldn’t imply it.
no. no it doesn’t. at all.
Because it looks like incest but it might not be? Or you could just go look at the tag.
why
Could go for the ole “not incest” tag.
Perhaps I’m really one of those people :D It’s actually the simultaneous blush that “rings the bell” for me.
In that case, I agree the tag is unnecessary.
I’m just not sure how this is even possibly implied incest though.
unless you’re one of those people who think that horns are touching = in a relationship
There’s “implied incest” tag that is used with safe pics. >>815652 is actually pretty similar to this image, and it has the tag. I think it’d be perfectly acceptable here.
and undone because safe image
Done, though apparently that tag’s never been used before.