@Background Pony #B898  
Anarchism: The abolition of all unjustified hierarchy.  
Socialism: Workplace democracy; an economic system in which everyone holds the same relation of production–i.e. THE ABSENCE OF WORKPLACE HIERARCHY.
 
Oh by the way, socialist anarchism as a term is redundant; all anarchy is socialism.
 
Sincerely, an anarchist.

@AaronMk  
That all seems entirely wrong.

@Drumb
 
No. See: Revolutionary Catalonia and Rojava today.
 
One of the pretenses of Anarchism in the broad political sense is to create a totally horizontal political structure as opposed to Hierarchial. It would be historically comparable to Amerindians who formed society in much the same way. In modern execution it’s been interpreted in the broadest since as being to establish a political model where the individual is less a subject of the state but can be seen as an extension. Or in the words of Bookchin and Ocalan: to reinvision models such as confederalism and federalism in government as not so much a Hierarchial expression of a ruling class, but as a realm of expression of the individual in his local and national community.
 
According to Bookchin, this would be a return to and strengthening of the citizen-controlled town hall meeting of old New England, in particular Vermont where he’s from.

@Tyamat  
Well yes it is, anarchy is the abolishment of state, but will created tribes and smaller states.

@Background Pony #B898  
No it isn’t. Is central in the communist/socialism ideology the removal of the state.

Anarcho-socialism is an oxymoron.