Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
No description provided.
You got rekt.
Tiger had a superior engine and was very great for mobility and durability. The flat armor was a horrible thing due to a high velocity gun would tear through it. But it was so thick it caused bounces. Henschel had a better design. Porsche’s a bit different but lacked some value. The other was as said easier to build. Many people love the tiger for it’s fancy body and crafty design. The King Tiger was good for a defensive tank. But most used it for a offensive. Which lead it to get poked at. Because it was slower then her sister. All in all I think literally the Porsche design of the King would of been better. That or the Löwe should of been used. Legitly heard of that tank before I played a whopping 1 hour of world of tanks. It looked nice and had way thicker armor then that game stated. Plus it looked rather handsome. But I am sure it would not of changed many fates in the war.
Actually the Tiger tank had two prototypes made, the Tiger we all know today and Porsche’s design. The Henschel design won because it was considered easier to produce then Porsche’s. Of course like all tanks it did have its problems.
…so, you don’t have anything to say. I could have guessed.
The way you stated it. Made. It feel like that toward most manners. Plus in all regards the KV-1 was paper thin on the sides most tigers were were able to kill IS-2 and KV-1. But the Pz.IV had a almost fair battle against the KV-1 plus must tank hunters were easy killers against the KV. Such as Stug’s and Marder’s. But Hitler demanded a tank that could instantly win against the KV. Hence why the production was restarted by Hensh.
I am. So?
1: I never said that I preferred Soviet tanks to German tanks, in fact the opposite is true.
2: “The Pz.IV with the short 75mm was effective against the KV,” while that may be true at point blank range most the time the German 88mm Anti Air gun was needed to take down KV-1’s.
I would use a real argument rather then a gif. You communist lover~
They were pretty shit. If there was a panther for every t-34 it would of been pretty much over. Go praise your Communist tin somewhere else and get hard for that arcade game world of tanks. They chucked them useless slobs in numbers at Germans. Literally Zerg rushed them. Then Stalin could forever be a super hero to people like you in the future. All said the rage debate goes on and on but to be completely honest your tanks were only good against the dated panzer III’s with 50mm’s they still were effective. Not as much as one would think. Plus the Pz.IV with the short 75mm was effective against the KV. The Tiger was in production by Porsche since 1938. Not the exact model we know and love. Just the infamous long one. It failed Hitler’s want for a better tank. Till he retook up the idea in 41 when he was taking more losses then the communist did. Plus their airforce was crippled and Stuka’s were pretty much raking the land. So to be honest your tanks are only famous for their puuuuure zerg rush spam. The fact Russia won the war. The fact basement dwellers (Not saying you two are ones.) Worship communism and their weapons. All and all Russia tasted Nordic fury and bute back with winter and won. nough said. There was not a single bit of rush. The panther was but redesigned in 43 after Kursk. Into the G series.
Right, Russian tanks were terrible which is why the Germans rushed the Tiger tank into production, just so that it could kill T-34’s and KV-1’s more effectively.
get out
Oh, its finally happening.
It will happen in 9.3. 1s will split into two tanks - kv-1s and kv-85.
Has it been confirmed yet? Cause I’ve been hearing that for a year now.
Or its simply the angle.
Eleven barrels of Wub!