Uploaded by Jellypony
1450x1400 PNG 1.36 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive196491 +-SH artist:zantyarz332 +-SH applejack209024 +-SH rarity226604 +-SH human292651 +-SH g42128375 +-SH my little pony: friendship is magic269442 +-SH simple ways1499 +-SH applejewel753 +-SH breast fondling2622 +-SH breast grab10620 +-SH breasts411613 +-SH busty applejack14632 +-SH busty rarity18404 +-SH cleavage49197 +-SH clothes681760 +-SH dress66789 +-SH female1918497 +-SH grope20559 +-SH hat135404 +-SH humanized124264 +-SH jewelry126870 +-SH lesbian123898 +-SH light skin7120 +-SH naked overalls185 +-SH overalls2822 +-SH rarihick457 +-SH scene interpretation11488 +-SH ship:rarijack8668 +-SH straw hat449
Source
Loading...
Loading...
That image isn’t even gay! What idiot did that?
I guess. Dumb boobs. >.<
But does this one specifically? After all we must remembered that no relationship is canon.If an artist want to express a sexual relationship greater cues must be given(hearts,facial expressions,direct wording confirming the ship ect.)since this pic is based of a scene in the show and lacks any other visual implications of greater sexual feelings,in the name of accuracy and respect for the interpretations of other this pic should be absent of the lesbian tag.
Many artists usually intend relationships over friendships.
If that was true then the whole show would be a sexual fun feast eh. What counts as intimate touching is relative (unless you say pushing a swing for friend is sexy) ,kissing obviously is but there none of the that here,and can’t a pony nuzzle a friend in comfort without others thinking they wanna bang?
I assumed lesbian and gay applied to stuff like nuzzling, kissing, and intimate touchimg to…
Actually that kinda my point,the image itself is not really gay unless the definition of a gay tag goes beyond sexual actions,which that image does not show. So that image should not really be at be tagged gay(as tecnicly they could just be friendshiping around)unless the author stated it was specifically. So nothing has changed.
so, >>546625 is totally gay, but above image is not lesbian?
sure, whatever, do whatever you want to.
But if we tagged by what people interpreted and not what was plain on the image,then the whole derpibooru tag system would be a complete anarchic mess of tangled beliefs and sexual debachery, more so than it is now.
I know, but it’s what most people interpret anyways.
Just because they’re two girls without bras having an intimate moment doesn’t mean they’re lesbians. Just because it’s hot doesn’t mean it has to be sexually charged.
Oh and changing the tags compromised your ‘Background Pony’ status.
then i tag it lesbian.
Agreed, two girls not wearing bras having an intimate moment together here people.
“Well I needed it to help you get back to yourself.”
“Yes but my Dress!and the mud,and and I…you …Spike!!!
It’s a scene interpretation. This is when she was cleaning the mud off of her dress. Not anyone’s fault it happens to be where her breasts are. People are just trying to over-specialize things.
“This isn’t sexual…” So, Touching boobs isn’t sexual? ._.
“Did these grow on trees?”
AJ: “Does an apple grow on a tree?”