Tag description suggestions

Tag name: breath Link
Short Description: A breath you can see.
Long Description: Visible clouds of steam near the character’s mouth or nose often seen in a cold atmosphere. Can also indicate a heavy breathing, sighing, snorting or huffing.
Example image:

Phew! Onomatopoeia next.

@Deliverer
Done.

@Mihay
Did a few changes but it has now been done, and given species tag.

IMO images in descriptions should probably use >>[image]s instead of >>[image]t as to take up less space.

Tag name: onomatopoeia Link
Short Description: A word that imitates the sound.
Long Description: A word that phonetically imitates, resembles, or suggests the sound that it describes. Common cases include zzz, pomf, nom, various crashing, exploding and impact sounds, eeees and skrees of a bat pony, animal and bodily noises and many, many other.
Example image:

@Dragonpone
Then it would be even harder (at least, for me) to find an images on which manifestation of the described term would be clearly visible without the need to open a full picture.

Next time I’ll try to capture the squigglevision.

@Deliverer
Done.

@Dragonpone
Considering how they only show up when searching 1 tag and only on the 1st page I don’t think it really matters. Especially as some of these would be harder to understand with small size.

Tag name: squigglevision Link
Short Description: An animation with wiggling and undulating outlines.
Long Description: A method of computer animation in which the outlines of shapes are made to wiggle and undulate, emulating the effect of sketchily hand-drawn animation.
Example image:

Next time we’ll clarify what it’s like to be in goliath's palm.

@Deliverer
Done.

Tag name: in goliath’s palm Link
Short Description: Placed in or on a giant hand or a paw.
Long Description: A tiny character placed in or on a giant hand or a paw. May require hand and/or tiny ponies tag.
Example image:

Note: Not sure if the tag should also require the micro tag.

Next time we’ll see what can be done with a limited palette.

So I edited the description tell me what you think. :)

@MaresFillies
…It just looks like you cut most of it out.
The hand implication won’t work here as some images have a giant paw instead of hand :p
Tiny implication looks good though ^

I’m updating the tag to remove hand implication, and I’ll suggest the full long description be added as I don’t see anything wrong with it. If you think it should stay shortened please explain why.

I thought “in goliath’s palm” could also be normal sized character on a giant hand/paw/talon?

And “tiny” is not defined and seems to not be limited to great size differences between characters (some use cases are solo micro). So I changed the implication from “tiny” to “size difference”.

Tag name: limited palette Link
Short Description: A few colors used.
Long Description: An image where the artist restricts themselves to a few colors, which may be far from the original ones. May be a part of a color palette challenge.
Example image:

Next time we’ll see if partial color relates to parties.

@TheGlitchedWolf
Oh I shortened it because I thought this part: “May require hand and/or tiny ponies tag” was more for the implied tag area.

Masturbation needs to imply rubbing self and/or playing with self

@TheGamerPainter
No on “rubbing”. Multiple methods do not involve rubbing.

No on “playing with self”, that tag doesn’t even exist. If you meant “playing with oneself”, that one is unrelated.

@saby
My brain’s computer:

Is there any tag for the new upcoming cartoon network show Pibby?

@TheGamerPainter
That’d be a question for the General Tag thread, since you’re not suggesting a definition…
…but yes, there are. You can find these things out for yourself by searching on the Tags page linked from the top navigation bar. A very useful feature is that an asterisk * will substitute for any amount of text, so if you’re not sure what an entire tag is but you know what part of it needs to be (eg. “pibby”) you can put an asterisk at the start and end, like I did, to show all tags with “pibby” in it.

@Background Pony #E87B
Ok

@Deliverer
Somehow this got missed but it is now done.

Tag name: partial color Link
Short Description: Monochrome with a bit of color.
Long Description: Use for images that are almost entirely monochrome, but have an element (or a few elements) fully colored. When done with a dramatic effect, add neo noir.
Example image:

Tag name: neo noir Link
Short Description: ‘Partial color’ with a dramatic effect.
Long Description: [As is, except for changing the ‘emphasis’ for a ‘dramatic effect’]
Example image: [As is]

Notes: If the tag was supposed to reference the Sin City’s partial coloring then it looks like a mess right now.

One tag dragged in the other. I may be not wording it right with the ‘dramatic effect’, but I think the difference between the two tags is definitely in some sort of a stylistic effect achieved in ‘neo noir’ images.

@Deliverer
I went ahead and wrote up a wholly different and hopefully much clearer description for “neo noir”. If it’s supposed to be different from “partial colour”, and it is, its details need to describe the “dramatic effect” in concrete terms.

The “partial color” description as suggested looks sufficient and good, will implement.

/edit: will change “full color” to “colored” because “full color” requires a range of values, and that would be misleading and/or create a needlessly strict definition.

/edit 2: “neo noir” cleaned up, ended up with about 2k removals and 300 retained.

May someone put a description on when the adventure in the comments tag should be used?
For example, how many comments need to be on an image.

@NICOGAMER3000
Hello! :) I edited the tag description.

I think it’s not a matter of how many comments but rather if the comments themselves are interesting and I guess drawn out so like pages of comments. Thanks for the suggestion!