Oh also, I wanted to throw my two cents in on this but forgot.
I believe you when you say that you are conservative, because most of what you say is in line with a conservative in the dictionary definition of the word. That is, to avoid drastic change in public policy and society in one direction or the other. While you haven’t said it outright, you strike me as someone who favors a measured and cautious approach to political issues.
Initially I considered whether you could be called a conservative in the Burkean tradition, but you stated that all are equal under God, whereas a Burkean traditionalist would argue that humanity is inherently hierarchical and society should be organized accordingly.
You haven’t commented much on economic issues, but if I had to guess, I imagine Christian democracy (small d here, not the Democratic Party) is a potential fit. These are devout and politically active Christians who are moderate to conservative on social issues, but are moderate, liberal, even slightly progressive on economic issues. That said, they do still reject socialism. Christian democrats favor government intervention in the economy and a welfare state, but also want private property rights to be respected.
Circling back to the crux of the issue, though. I think that Republicans have badly polluted the definition of “conservative,” and American media has just gone along with it. Because when I look at the MAGA movement and the GOP as it is now, I use the terms “reactionary,” “ultranationalist,” and “fascist.” There’s nothing conservative about the the self-styled “conservative party” in 2024.
