Uploaded by NekoJackun
729x781 JPG 298 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Just an edit…
Tags
+-SH safe2279833 +-SH artist:twilite-sparkleplz392 +-SH edit181944 +-SH starlight glimmer62570 +-SH sunset shimmer82604 +-SH equestria girls268062 +-SH g42122370 +-SH acoustic guitar281 +-SH bench3928 +-SH cute280148 +-SH duo208375 +-SH eyes closed149021 +-SH guitar7034 +-SH headphones11345 +-SH listening412 +-SH music5149 +-SH music notes5086 +-SH musical instrument16208 +-SH open mouth257347 +-SH playing guitar97 +-SH relaxing2255 +-SH singing9050 +-SH sitting100280 +-SH smiling430975
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Please. People passive-aggressively whine about stuff like shipping in the exact way you asked that question all the time. For all I know, this continued dialogue could be one long instance of it, but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt at this point.
My point is: in the future, you should be clearer about your intentions. If you want to be the tag police when you assume you’re seeing implied shipping, then say: “Hi, tag police here, I think there might be some implied shipping in this image, but I’m not sure. Could you clarify your intentions so I can correct the tags if needed? kthxbyeomglolbbq”
Why the hell would I want to do that? Not only would it be a waste of my time to state that on an image I could filter out, it would be breaking rule 4.
Buddy, you’re anon too. What’s the big deal about it anyway?
The problem is in the way you asked. You did not state that your intention was only to make sure that the tags are correct. Perhaps that is a reason people might think is implied.
But another easily inferred reason is that you’re here to whine about implied shipping. There’s certainly compelling evidence toward that implication: the fact that you’re anon, the phrasing of your initial question, and the fact that the implication in question is shipping between two major characters of the same gender are strong indicators.
I find it highly amusing that you’re playing tag police regarding implications and yet you fail to tag your own intentions, thus causing others to mistake your intentions.
And on that note, no, it’s not an odd assumption at all. You’ve stated outright that you dislike implied shipping, and you are here playing tag police, so you must suspect this piece of implying shipping. QED
A lot of things aren’t tagged on this image. A lot of people don’t tag things when they upload images.
That’s a really odd assumption. The picture is fairly ambiguous in whether or not it’s shipping, so why is it a problem for me to ask the uploader what their intention was?
Well, it’s not tagged, so there’s no implication, then.
Except in your head! And now you can’t un-think it! :3
Because if it is shipping, I want me and others who feel the same to be able to filter it out. What’s the point of a filter if no one tags the things you filter correctly?
It’s fun. If the purpose of your question is for tagging, you should be upfront about that, and if you’re a staff member doing this work, you shouldn’t be doing so as an anon.
Therefore, I question your motives.
You didn’t even make the edit, why are you bothering?
[SNARK]
If there is an implication, it has to be tagged, genius.
It’s pretty obvious you’re only here to complain about a perceived shipping implication, so you deserve whatever snark you get.
tfw starlight used sci-twi’s equipment to beam sunset into her cell phone; so that she can listen to her perform and talk to her whenever she wants :p