dawwww she loves her~

Golly, comrade.

Sequel please

whip-whiplash

@Chopsticks  
She learned from the best:  

student and teacher yuri hot~count ziltromon

Yah, I’m not the only one with an episodic Starlight foal fiddler image.

@Background Pony #967B  
use these formats and you’ll be fine  
>>1753488s  
>>1753488t  
>>1753488p
 
see:
 

@alchemy  
Oh, It’s already up there
 
1753488 but I don’t really know if I’m allowed to link it…

Just gonna say it, please make an inappropriate sequel

@Gamer_KM  
Oh believe me when I say that Foalcon is the least concern when it comes to my work.  
And if I really didn’t want this to be associated with my stuff I wouldn’t put the signature on. So I guess it IS kinda confusing…
 
 
@SYZekrom  
Well, I wouldn’t say I expect to be “Recognize” but because of the signature and my style, some people connected my pics and keeps asking me for an artist tag, which I’ll eventually deliver, but there’s some reasons why I’m keeping myself untagged for now _{(one of them beeing that I can’t think of an artist tag…)}  
So, even if I don’t consider myself an “Anonymous Artist” I don’t think the tag is a mistake.
 
Tho, I think you are overthinking an artist tag… ;)

@Gamer_KM  
Okay, but I’m not asking for a genral explanation of the Anonymous Artist tag though, I’m asking if this one was mistakenly tagged with it, because the picture is literally signed and there’s a description that looks like its written by the artist, who expects the people reading it to know who they are.

@SYZekrom  
Aometimes people Dont want their art associates with certain things. Specially with foalcon.

 
 
Why does this say Anonymous Artist? I’m not seeing anything other than Derpibooru results with Google Image Search, so I’m assuming this description was written for this Derpibooru upload and not pulled from some other place. Sounds like they’re talking as if they’re supposed to be recognizable. And the image is even signed, though I can’t read the signature. Was the Anonymous Artist tag a mistake?

UNF

Starglow?

Oh, please no… Really?

YES

definitely.

What the hay

I guess it was only a matter of time.

This one should be called Cozy Glimmer! :)

To answer your question, yes

She seemed to be designed to be evil, continue in the midst of the production process, they changed their ideas and became that episode