Uploaded by PhilClinton
519x266 JPG 62 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2282416 +-SH artist:megasweet3225 +-SH fluttershy268985 +-SH rainbow dash291314 +-SH human269965 +-SH derpibooru8188 +-SH g42124179 +-SH assisted exposure2311 +-SH blue underwear2686 +-SH bunny print underwear47 +-SH clothes679777 +-SH embarrassed16309 +-SH embarrassed underwear exposure1096 +-SH exploitable meme33818 +-SH face print underwear62 +-SH female1913105 +-SH flattershy580 +-SH humanized124000 +-SH juxtaposition4972 +-SH juxtaposition win3512 +-SH lesbian123576 +-SH meta18892 +-SH panties66505 +-SH prank1797 +-SH ship:flutterdash6395 +-SH shipping268360 +-SH silly panties257 +-SH skirt59753 +-SH skirt lift5600 +-SH underwear82383 +-SH upskirt7567 +-SH young1985 +-SH younger24547
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
lmao original on left got deleted, why is this still here hahahahaha
Thats why I’m gonna combat this picture. Watch me
Butthurt alarm about to go off, I’m sure.
When it’s just you on the line, then you might feel like you could probably chance some things. However, the admins seem to care about the service their providing to the community.
If that’s the case, then they’d probably aren’t using their own judgement in regards to this. Their probably trying to figure out how the UK would feel.
Since this is on a UK server or something to that effect, it’s subject to UK law. And personally, I’d hate to see the people running it get arrested for something someone else uploaded.
@SuperGex8
You have no idea.
There is much, much more explicit than this. This is just a pantyshot, but there may be something more sexual to it considering the age of the Fluttershy here.
The most extreme images include child group sex with children, “foalcon,” showing actual child genitalia, and foal futanari.
Paheal probably doesn’t have a problem with it as long as it’s not an actual image of a child, but DB’s blog post leads me to believe that it wouldn’t be on here at all, filters or not.