Uploaded by Background Pony #CC99
1776x3432 PNG 2.55 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
![Play Battle Gem Ponies on Mobile or PC](https://derpicdn.net/spns/2024/11/2/b0a0fb46-9905-11ef-8176-02420a030003.gif)
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2288557 +-SH applejack209175 +-SH fluttershy269533 +-SH owlowiscious2317 +-SH pinkie pie267530 +-SH rainbow dash292053 +-SH rarity226732 +-SH spike95676 +-SH sweetie belle58713 +-SH trenderhoof1016 +-SH twilight sparkle372560 +-SH bird15847 +-SH dragon93065 +-SH earth pony554233 +-SH owl1917 +-SH pegasus546981 +-SH pony1718480 +-SH unicorn591148 +-SH g42129607 +-SH butterfly wings970 +-SH female1920179 +-SH hat135545 +-SH ice cream7028 +-SH male592872 +-SH mane seven8374 +-SH mane six39313 +-SH otp427 +-SH seven deadly sins49 +-SH ship:applespike978 +-SH ship:sparity8663 +-SH shipping269512 +-SH sin of envy75 +-SH sin of gluttony71 +-SH sin of greed97 +-SH sin of lust99 +-SH sin of pride134 +-SH sin of sloth58 +-SH sin of wrath103 +-SH straight190149 +-SH wings255729
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Thanks, also you forgot a “t” in deviantart.
Also let me link it properly, here.
titanium-dats-me.devianart.com/journal/Jim-Miller-confirms-SPIKE-ISN-T-A-BABY-KID-ANYMORE-605918978. this the page where it show Jim Miller talking on his twitterpage about spike age or you could type Jim Miller Spike age in the search box. I have ten years pass from when Twilight got her cutie mark and the first episode of the series. I put Twilight at six when she got her cutie mark and hatch spike. So this would put Spike at ten in dragon years at the first episode. My Little Pony, The Princess Promenade is where I got the information about G3 Spike.
Please tell me you have a source link for this information, as I’d like to have it on hand for when anyone tries to say Spike is too young.
Heh, I can understand that though I still hope others consider what I have said seriously.
Sorry, you talked about comparing Spike & Rarity to Anakin & Padme that I just had to make the Star Wars joke!
Well all that wouldn’t apply, I am only talking about how Padmé knew Anakin yet after he grew up they got together despite an age difference.
And then Spike becomes a bad guy, betrays everyone and his 2 kids escape the carnage only to have his son return later as an adult and then they team-up kill Spike’s dark master!
BS.
Only people who deny that the creators of any show can and will say things that are obviously not reflected on the show itself, are those with personal reasons to close themselves upon a specific theme. Like in this case. Everything “Blondie” sad in his previous posts was false, and I proved it. He just ignored it and then shileded himself behind people who mentioned a panel he didn’t even know about.
Concernning Spike, yes. What I said its true. You think if people went ahead and asked them directly, in camera, whether Bonbon and Lyra are really gay and in a lesbian relationship, that they would say “yes they are”? Its the same. They have to say certain things to avoid going into dangerous territory which they can be criticized about. That doesn’t mean anything unless its REPRESENTED in the show. You can put all the excuses you want and foolishly think that if the creators say Twilight has lived in a giant shoe during seasons 1-4, then its true because it came from their mouth despite we obviously seeing something different for years.
Spike isn’t treated like a child (like the CMC or the other kids), he has a job, he’s left alone, given responsabilities, goes on business trips, doesn’t go to school, etc. For something like this to be canon, it has to be reflected on the show. If the creators confirm it, fine. But if what they say contradicts the show’s canon, while sounding like an obvious attempt to deviate the attention from dangerous topics, then it obvious has to be taken with a grain of salt.
I already said I don’t ship Sparity (don’t like Rarity enough for it), I don’t really care about that ship, so don’t even try the shipper-obsessed argument because you’re wasting your time.
Yeah, you can’t win against definative proof.
Dude don’t argue with this guy its no use.
And yet he’s not act like a nine year old.
And yet he is nine.
He is:
working like an adult,
not going to school,
treated like an adult,
doesn’t need an adult’s supervising.
There is nothing left to argue. Your hypothesis has already been proven false. Spike is a little kid, probably eight or nine years old. So says the people who made him, put the words in his animated cartoon mouth, and send him on friendship adventures. Spike, by his fictional nature, is what they say he is. mic drop
I don’t even ship them, Im just stating the obvious flaw in your argument.
You also have failed to adress the many contradictionsI showed in your argument, instead just shielding yourself behind a panel you didn’t know existed before you made all those ridiculous claims.
Indeed, to a dedicated shipper trivial things like direct contradictions from the show’s creator and head writer can not change what they know to be true.
Where did he give the impression he wasn’t being serious? A dedicated fan like that can know the character better than the person who created him. (e.g., >>314265 where even Lauren Faust says Spike has the maturity of an elementary-age kid.)
>What they are forced to say in open panels in order to appease the masses by offering the safest and less controversial opinion, doesn’t change what can be inferred by logic.
You are kidding, right? Oh my god, you can’t be serious.