Ok… Many many many… Ok the picture isn’t loading for me and I crashed 45939449 times already just trying to comment and look at the picture!

@Damaged  
yeah but you gotta keep in mind… a H U G E majority of artists put a DNP up because they are tired of really stupid edits/edits that they think makes their artwork look bad.. a spiral thing like this I would think would be different and they probably wouldn’t mind

Mankind was not ready to face this beast

@Rainboom Dash  
I got through a handful of the artists listed, and found 5 with DNP. One of them is literally “No edits” that says nothing of permission.
 
shrugs

It’s no use!

@Rainboom Dash  
I underestimated how much bitrate it would take… even CRF=28 x265 slow preset ended up being over 40mb from the 2160p60 source downscaled to 720p.. also only took about 6 minutes to compress, hmm  
And I’m not sure tuning the psy-rd or aq-strength would help any cause it probably needs higher values (I left at default) I could try increasing the merange but 720p isn’t very high so I’m not sure how much it would help… but I’m not sure how you’d increase with VP9, it’d just be for testing with x265..
 
@Algebroot  
Yeah, takes a few seconds for the page to load and have to scroll all the way down if you didn’t click from the notifications :/

@Rainboom Dash  
Didn’t know of “Ctrl+F” before. (Never looked up what browsers can do)
 
That really is a lot of tags! (Also makes the comments section difficult to reach…)

@miky94c  
it says “no edits without permission” and in detailed info says “too many people making unauthorized edits, including removing artist signature”  
So probably doesn’t count adding it to a massive spiral.. but shrugs  
Also, pretty sure it failed at this point.. I already reported it like 10min ago

I hope that this works some day….

Dude u know the edit is was not allowed of artist Charliexe and oltre check something artist is was no edit  
and there more artist say : no edits… have fun…

@Algebroot  
I know that was a rhetorical question but according to ctrl+f and “+” like 5,030 or something _^sorry

Jesus fucking Christ, how long did the tagging took?

Wow.
 
An enormous skyscraper of tags!

@rebane2001  
I’m using adobe media encoder  
I’m not sure why it was speeding it up… the thing is it says 24 fps because it compressed into 24, but it clearly sped it up about to 29.94 if my math was correct.. even though I specified in the settings to grab 24 images a second if original frame rate is not specified…  
I’ll definitely have to try apple prores and see how that works..  
And I grabbed lagarith from leetcode, I think

@Rainboom Dash  
That should be impossible - if the source footage is 8 bit without noticable banding, the output should be that as well  
Unless you’re using a wonky encoder or converting color

@rebane2001  
I used the PNG images and did RGB, caused lots of banding  
I also tried YUV 4:2:2, caused lots of banding  
DNxHD only caused a small amount of banding but sped it from 24 to 29.94 fps.. even though I said if no fps is specified (like image sequence) do 24.. most codecs obey but DNxHD didn’t… I don’t think I actually tried apple prores on those specific PNG images.. I’ll have to do that because it does cause less banding than lagarith for most stuff

@Rainboom Dash  
Lagarith is literally lossless, maybe you didn’t use the RGB mode or something  
It is a 1:1 match to an 8-bit uncompressed

@rebane2001  
Ah, I’ve used lagarith before… caused massive banding even though it’s supposed to be LOSSLESS  
But… to be fair a lot of codecs were causing massive banding on recompress.. really sucks  
I’ve found apple prores (even though it’s lossy) causes much less banding on average

@Rainboom Dash  
If you want 30GB of lagarith lossless, let me know and I’ll send it to you tomorrow

Reminder that someone spent time adding all those tags

@rebane2001  
ah  
Well I know 720p60 would be easy to do.. 1080p60 is questionable
 
I would use the 4k stream if I were to recompress… YT gave it… wow, only about 25mbps during the high motion and an average of 20… yeah, that’s not very good… it really should have given it more but it probably saw a ton of motion and since it works on a CRF based system lowered the quality a bunch.. I know it gives far more bitrate if it thinks it’s needed but I guess the high motion made it lower it.. okay, I’m rambling on  
Still not processed.. questionable if it failed or not but it really does take a long, long time so it’s possible it’s still processing.. hmm

@Rainboom Dash  
This is 60fps, VP9/opus, encoded straight from a lossless AVI  
Lower resolutions are better because the rapid movements bitstarve it really hard on higher resolutions  
For some dumb reason I remembered the Derpi limit as 20MB instead of 25MB, but I don’t think there’s a point in reuploading - those who want to see it in it’s full glory can look at the 4k@60 version on YouTube

If this isn’t 60 fps I’m gonna have to reupload because I know 720p60 should be really easy to compress into 25mb… might even be able to squeeze in 1080p60 without a lot of compression artifacts  
eh, idk.. there’s a lot of motion… Youtube’s 720p60 stream is 40mb but looks pretty compressed already… 720p60 is probably the limit

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

What the actual fuck