Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Ihhh on image #1966481

Ihhh
Duck - Likes to sockpuppet for drama
Duck - 1104243, just... 1104243
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition

<<<<<
"[@Vinyl Fluff":](/1966481#comment_7911090
[bq="Vinyl
) Fluff"] 

>
People have asked the new writers as they came on if they’d followed the show previously, if they knew the established lore, etc. And a few have said they had not, and they weren’t even required to watch a single episode before writing one. THAT got a lot of negative attention.[/bq]



 
You still haven't provided a source for that. All you have to do is like to where they said that, It's not that hard. If you can't do that, I have no reason to believe you. I'm not going to take your word that any writer ever said any of those things. All you have to do is provide a source. Why is that so hard?

[bq]

 

>
Again, you’ve not been paying attention.[/bq]



 
Paying attention to what? You claimed that recent episodes repeated past lessons and ignored previous character development, yet you provided no evidence of said claim anywhere. It's not my job to prove your claims for you. If you're not willing to provide evidence for your claims, I'm not willing to accept them.

[bq]

 

>
I’m not going to dig through three years worth of Twitter feeds for you for staff quotes.[/bq]



 
If you're not willing to put in the effort to provide proof of your claims, I have no reason to accept them as true.

[bq]

 

>
I’m not going to continue wasting time on someone who obviously wasn’t paying attention[/bq]



 
That's what they all say.


 
I hope that you to hold to your word by not continuing, but due to past experiences, I have reasona to belie vexpectation that you won't, and will reply to me anyway.
No reason given
Edited by Ihhh
Ihhh
Duck - Likes to sockpuppet for drama
Duck - 1104243, just... 1104243
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition

<<<<<
"@Vinyl Fluff":/1966481#comment_7911090
[bq="Vinyl Fluff"] People have asked the new writers as they came on if they’d followed the show previously, if they knew the established lore, etc. And a few have said they had not, and they weren’t even required to watch a single episode before writing one. THAT got a lot of negative attention.[/bq]

You still haven't provided a source for that. All you have to do is like to where they said that, It's not that hard. If you can't do that, I have no reason to believe you. I'm not going to take your word that any writer ever said any of those things. All you have to do is provide a source. Why is that so hard?

[bq]Again, you’ve not been paying attention.[/bq]

Paying attention to what? You claimed that recent episodes repeated past lessons and ignored previous character development, yet you provided no evidence of said claim anywhere. It's not my job to prove your claims for you. If you're not willing to provide evidence for your claims, I'm not willing to accept them.

[bq]I’m not going to dig through three years worth of Twitter feeds for you for staff quotes.[/bq]

If you're not willing to put in the effort to provide proof of your claims, I have no reason to accept them as true.

[bq]I’m not going to continue wasting time on someone who obviously wasn’t paying attention[/bq]

That's what they all say.

I hope that you to hold to your word by not continuing, but I have reasonable expectation that you won't, and will reply to me anyway.
No reason given
Edited by Ihhh