General Tag Discussion

@BossGriffin
I didn’t participate in the great Breast-Tag Wars of the 2010s (partially because I wasn’t staff then and partially cause I didn’t really care) but you can find a lot of it here:

[NSFW][PROPOSAL] Standardizing the Character-Breast Tags
busty [character name] tags

How dull!

Would a character’s face be visible be considered offscreen character?
Ex:

is 3522476 oc only?

@mdashlw
yes

>>3051829 Can any mods remove ass tag from this image? Thanks

@Shade Partisan
What the fuck do you mean “over 500 pages of tag changes”?

@Deserter
…This was a thing some random unregistered user did. Add (I think) every single possible tag to images like that,then someone had to remove them all. Then they would get the tags locked in that image.

Tag vandalism, especially targeted marsminer’s art and some grimdark-explicit images

why “dog tags” when there’s only one?

@Background Pony #06F2
Because there are almost always two

Don’t confuse “dog tags”, the kind of military identifier worn on a chain, with a pet tag, which a dog would wear.

@Background Pony #52BA
@Background Pony #06F2
One for the body, one for the report.

So, someone’s changed the name of this gryphon:

from “Gail” to “Gannet”, and gave “Gail” to a background gryphon from the comics, I feel like I’m missing something because I don’t think either have “official” names.

@Deserter
Name polls

would >>2827173 and >>2827316 be tagged anatomically correct/vulva?

should these be tagged ponut?

@mdashlw
I would tag them vulva outline,
and ponut outline ?

Now that we finally have a franchise tag for G4 pony, can we please finally rename the pilot episode tag to something else, to stop people from slapping it to random images that have nothing to do with the G4 pilot episode?

Potential new names:

When it comes to pony clothing designs, how should I tell the difference between latex socks and latex boots?

@Algebroot Neogears
Boots have soles, socks don’t.

Short description suggestion for ball tag.

“A round object. Don’t be confused with balls which refers to genitalia.”

@LightningBolt
@Ciaran
solo female(and solo * tags in general) in current state seems to be equivalent of solo, female, -safe to me. Or solo, female, (suggestive OR questionable OR explicit) with semantics of character is being suggestive part of image.
I don’t see usefulness of solo * tags in current state and suggest either:

@Algebroot Neogears
Maybe create tag latex legwear, imply it by both tags and add description stating that ponies can be tagged with this. Or maybe tag ponies in latex socks and boots with latex hoofwear without implication.

@uis
No.

@LightningBolt
I edited suggestion to be more clear. No to what part? Changing meaning, deleting or replacing?
In case of rplacing we can start by implying suggestive character/solo suggestive/whatever from solo *.

@uis
Specific genders are very important for people’s filters and searches.