Comments
Search Results
Dirty Bit ![Thread Starter - Hazbin Hotel Thread [Possible NSFW/Dark]](https://derpicdn.net/badges/2017/7/2/0bd59d4eff9c3aeaad.svg "Thread Starter - Hazbin Hotel Thread [Possible NSFW/Dark]")
That's him, officer
A part of me wonders if this is an intelligent troll, what with Kawai meaning pitiful while Kawaii means cute
Dirty Bit
That's him, officer
@Neko Majin C
But Terra was voiced by Natalie Lander, who I know is the voice of Kisala from Rogue Galaxy
But Terra was voiced by Natalie Lander, who I know is the voice of Kisala from Rogue Galaxy
Neko Majin C 
Twilight's Westley
I remember Pony Fantasy VI. Twilight was an awesome Terra. Made even more perfect by the fact she is voiced by Tara Strong.
Deloreandudetommy 
I’m bed bound too, I had nose surgery today to fix some serious breating problems today so I can’t do much.
Dirty Bit
That's him, officer
Depending on how I eat at the moment, the chances of the latter picture are 50/50
Draco_2k
The main problem I’ve run into is that there’s no meaningful metric by which to compare them. On top of that, the darndest thing is that photos of miniatures lead the top of “That’s not creepy, I like that” chart.
Mainly the latter, former would be a bonus if possible. The fake rim lighting seems to do the job.
2snacks’ work is probably the best of all I’ve seen (flat shading there as well), however camera angles still seem to present a hazard. Note how jumpy fluttershy’s animation is and how common flat angles are:
![full]()
That’s the problem with ShadowSquirrel’s models as well: they can look great, but only from a very specific angle; if you want to do fluid animation or even a simple 3/4ths view, you’re in for a world of pain.
Not that avoiding the latter isn’t a valid solution, as shown.
I’ve yet to find a way to share files between 3D applications that isn’t a step above pulling teeth.
For what it’s worth, it would be interesting to see a comparison between the different ways people portray 3D ponies. Although, I doubt there is nearly enough material to make a meaningful comparison document.
The main problem I’ve run into is that there’s no meaningful metric by which to compare them. On top of that, the darndest thing is that photos of miniatures lead the top of “That’s not creepy, I like that” chart.
Actually, since you don’t specify directly – is it your goal to achieve more show accurate ponies, or is it to simply make a pony model that looks decent in 3D?
Mainly the latter, former would be a bonus if possible. The fake rim lighting seems to do the job.
2snacks’ work is probably the best of all I’ve seen (flat shading there as well), however camera angles still seem to present a hazard. Note how jumpy fluttershy’s animation is and how common flat angles are:
That’s the problem with ShadowSquirrel’s models as well: they can look great, but only from a very specific angle; if you want to do fluid animation or even a simple 3/4ths view, you’re in for a world of pain.
Not that avoiding the latter isn’t a valid solution, as shown.
lack of decent source files for his models
I’ve yet to find a way to share files between 3D applications that isn’t a step above pulling teeth.
wildrook 
(giant belch)
Pinkie Pie: Excuse me.
Mr. and Mrs. Cake: (flat) What.
Pinkie Pie: What?
Mr. Cake: We expected you to be…well…
Pinkie Pie: All over the place? I can see why, but it just feels…like ants running around in my belly.
Pinkie Pie: Excuse me.
Mr. and Mrs. Cake: (flat) What.
Pinkie Pie: What?
Mr. Cake: We expected you to be…well…
Pinkie Pie: All over the place? I can see why, but it just feels…like ants running around in my belly.
Showing results 826001 - 826025 of 826151 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for comments with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, comments containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this comment. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this comment. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this comment. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this comment. | id:1000000 |
image_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the image this comment belongs to. | image_id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:comments matches comments you have posted if you are signed in. | my:comments |
user_id | Literal | Matches comments with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |