@UserAccount  
Much to the tears of RArijack shippers…including me

Ironically, AJ went on to marry RD. Glad she gave up her bigotry.

It occurs to me that an image talking about orgies would probably be more suggestive than safe.
 
@Dangerous Amoeba  
Certain safety-related items, obviously.
 
And a tarp. (Because they don’t want to have to clean the floor but they’re too cheap to provide a bed).

@Scrounge  
Good point. So what would the order look like?
 
>The “Build your own orgy” combo comes with 6 people, you chose the specifics of each individual, such as gender, “sizes”, skin color and so on.  
And then what?
 

@Princess♠Molestia  
I just realized… wouldn’t an orgy be a combo on its own?

 

@Dangerous Amoeba  
Does it even matter?

@Scrounge  
IDK what you’re saying anymore, my entire argument is “crimes should be judged on their specifics, and emotional circumstance shouldn’t be ignored”.
 
What are YOU saying?

@Dangerous Amoeba  
I’ll admit you can’t force people to do meditation or whatever, but that doesn’t make it a good thing.
 
Just because these problems exist doesn’t mean they should get preferential treatment over those who were only a danger to one or two people rather than everyone around them.

@Scrounge  
>assassin than a berserker  
>Berserker  
This is not an RPG, what is that? Classically a berserker is a person armed with heavy weapons such as battle axes and war hammers, and usually has either heavy or no armor. Its not like beserkers cant maintain there cool, although soldiers (especially after duty) might be jumpy.
 
That said. Different things can trigger different behaviors, you can people to not lose their cool under most situations but sometimes it happens. Its human nature, how are you gonna fight it?

@Dangerous Amoeba  
People are responsible for managing those lapses of judgement, are they not? I’d feel more comfortable next to an assassin than a berserker.

@Scrounge  
That`s why having a system where only the outcome of a crime is considered is unjust. Everyone has lapses of judgement whether it be a overcome by emotions or just didn’t think something through, but our current justice system doesn’t care about the events that transpired, it only looks at the actual crime.

@Dangerous Amoeba  
I’ve always considered crimes of passion to be a shameful thing. They’re always a loss of control, a failure to stick to the plan, a derail. Not like, you know, a bank job or a murder-for-hire. Those are business.

@Scrounge  
Depends on the situation, sure generally hitting, and hurting people is bad, but our emotions are often uncontrollable and punishment should fit the specifics of a crime.
 
For example: The spouse who comes home and their other is cheating on them, in a fit of rage/ emotions, they commit a double homicide. Is it bad to kill people? Under most conditions, yes, but i think the killer should at worst be given a lighter sentence and at best just years of pre-paid therapy.

@Dangerous Amoeba  
Can we at least agree that spousal abuse not generally being seen as acceptable any more is a good thing?

@Scrounge  
>Used to be worst  
No it used to be useful, sure it threw everyone else rights out the window, but at that time, what didn’t? Now its just some fairy tale BS.

@Dangerous Amoeba  
Yeah, but it used to be even worse. At least divorce has generally become more acceptable nowadays, which means less people would have to resort to murder or suicide in order to escape a marriage gone horribly wrong.

@Scrounge  
Marriage early on was more of a family contract, so it was the trade of genetics within families. At that point in time, i would be ok/support it. But now its garbage.

@Dangerous Amoeba  
“Anymore” rather than “in the first place”? Don’t tell me you’re going soft.
 
Marriage could theoretically serve a useful, or at least pleasant, purpose, but the institution’s been abused and misused in various ways pretty much since day one.
 
That said, good luck getting rid of anything even tangentaly related to religion. The church has its claws sunk too deep.

 
Yea, but it still shouldn’t exist anymore.

@Dangerous Amoeba  
I was under the impression it started as a religion thing, so if that’s true there’s no surprise it doesn’t seem logical.

I dont even know why marriage is a thing, why does anyone need anyone else validating their relationship? Get rid of marriage, there is really no point. And its harmful, it can cause people to ruin themselves if their wives (or husbands) demand things after divorce, and/or get divorced on false accusations.

@Background Pony #8923  
Well, this hypothetical person is getting food from Subway, so they’re obviously not a paragon of good judgement to begin with.
 
 
@PLCTheCd  
So you can’t see them in a relationship, but would be fine with them having casual sex?

That sounds AWESOME!

Don’t you mean… a hooflong?